• THG·自嘲的猫     你问我为什么追《亲爱的翻译官》,我说我有个口译梦 DAY1

    • Just for Fun

    • 片段讲解秀

    • from:《蒙娜丽莎的微笑》


    这个剧不知道大家会不会去看,我看了点,但是请不要误解我,我绝对不是去看黄轩的!黄轩有什么好看的?看他的圆手吗?(这是一个哏,懂不懂看悟性)哈哈哈。(严肃脸)作为一个英语科班毕业的人,谁没有个同传梦呢?(傲娇脸)然而大部分人都不会选择成为同传,因为这个职业掉头发。(扯,明明是天资和努力不够!)嗯,但是口译还是适合普罗大众的,我这个小透明也考过高级口译,高强度的训练还是对我的英语学习生涯产生了巨大的影响的。所以!时隔多年,我要把口译捡起来,并且作为兴趣,再把兴趣发展到极致!

    然而对于大部分朋友,大家来自不同专业背景,一上来直接练口译估计我这节目也要狗带了,所以我决定先带大家练习实境课堂的听力听写。走出国门求学以后还是发现在国内学英语挺扯的,当然我也不是全盘否认,如果你在国内用的是正确的训练方法、树立的是正确的学习目标,那么你出国后还是很牛x的。比如我的老东家XDF就有很多老师都有自成一体的教学方法。大部分同学出国求学都会担心自己上课能不能听懂课,日常听说读写虽然没有问题,但是和学术一沾边就蒙逼。嗯,这个担心是对的,因为我在上金融学基础的时候,听到jargon的时候常常需要一边听课一边记笔记一边看ppt一边Google的(嗯,因为本科背景跟工商管理无关,所以这对我来说是个不小的挑战,毕竟我科学计算器都用不熟练了lol)。

    那么接下来,我就来说说我们怎么训练吧。
    1、第一阶段目标:能两遍之内听写出国外实境课堂的课程内容。
    (NB:也就是说,这个阶段过了听懂国外大学本科或研究生阶段课程是木有问题了)

    2、素材:国外大学公开课或演讲素材,如TED等。
    (NB:嗯,你们要是对MBA课程感兴趣,我把我们课上的录音拿来供大家听写玩耍)

    3、训练步骤:
    step1: 先整体听一遍课程音频片段,了解大概内容;
    step2: 学习课程里出现的专业术语及难词;
    step3: 点开音频一句一暂停进行听写,反复听,听到写出来为止(实在写不出来的,请用下划线代替);
    step4: 听我的难点讲解(即分析这个句子为什么比较难辨识,是语音现象还是表达习惯等)
    step5: 对照原文批改自己的听写,告诉我你的正确率。
    (NB:正确率计算方法——包括听写在内每错一处扣1分,得分除以满分100即为相对正确率。)

    整个视频5分钟之内,听写所需时长根据个人水平长短不同(不重要,重要的是长此以往大家都会进步)。建议一起训练的同学至少有高中(包括)以上英语水平。凡事无绝对,我知道圈内很多小学生都很牛x了,你们自己看着办。

    Day1嘛,要把规矩定好,不要嫌我叨逼叨啊。
    开始训练之前,还是要说,有的东西其实方法人人都懂,能坚持的寥寥无几。开这个节目费这么大劲剪视频录音频找素材,也是为了督促和大家一样不自觉的我自己坚持训练。英语是一种skill,不练怎么会熟。预祝大家早日把把英语练成可以安身立命的技能,这样至少饿不死对不?哈哈

    开始了。
    --------------------

    素材:哈佛大学公开课(杀人的道德侧面)
    (NB:这段因为是公开课,各个级别的学生都会参与,比专业课的语速会慢一点;演讲者也十分注意用词和语速等演讲技巧,难度级别——一星半)


    step1: 先整体听一遍课程片段,了解大概内容;

    160'

    step2: 学习课程里出现的专业术语及难词;
    温馨提示:此时你需要一个单词本

    justice n.正义
    trolley car n.有轨电车
    hurtle v.猛冲
    track n.轨道;v.追踪
    side track n.旁轨
    assume vt.假定
    brake n.刹车
    steering wheel n.方向盘
    poll n.投票
    majority n.大多数
    investigate v.调查

    step3: 点开音频一句一暂停进行听写,反复听,听到写出来为止(实在写不出来的,请用下划线代替);
    温馨提示:此时你需要准备草稿本

    step4: 听我的难点讲解(即分析这个句子为什么比较难辨识,是语音现象还是表达习惯等)
    温馨提示:进行有必要的笔记

    54'

    1. Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car, and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour.

    31'

    2. At the end of the track, you notice five workers working on the track.

    31'

    3. Let’s assume you know that for sure.

    47'

    4. And so you feel helpless until you notice that there is, off to the right, a side track.

    46'

    5. Your steering wheel works, so you can turn the trolley car if you want to, on the sidetrack, killing the one, but sparing the five.

    35'

    6. Because it can’t be right to kill five people when you can only kill one person instead. It wouldn’t be right to kill five if you could kill one person instead.

    step5: 对照原文批改自己的听写,告诉我你的正确率。
    温馨提示:回复在留言板上,大家有疑惑的地方也可以一并留言,我尽快解答哈

    This is a course about justice and we begin with a story.
    Suppose you are the driver of a trolley car, and your trolley car is hurtling down the track at 60 miles an hour.
    At the end of the track, you notice five workers working on the track.
    You try to stop, but you can’t, your brakes don’t work.
    You feel desperate because you know that if you crash into the five workers, they will all die.
    Let’s assume you know that for sure.
    And so you feel helpless until you notice that there is, off to the right, a side track.
    And at the end of that track, there is one worker working on the track.
    Your steering wheel works, so you can turn the trolley car if you want to, on the sidetrack, killing the one, but sparing the five.
    Here’s our first question, what’s the right thing to do? what would you do?
    Let’s take a poll. How many would turn the trolley car onto the side track? Raise your hands.
    How many wouldn’t? How many would go straight ahead?
    Keep your hands up, those who would go straight ahead.
    A handful of people would, a vast majority would turn.
    Let’s hear first now we need to investigate the reasons why you think it’s the right thing to do.
    Let’s begin with those in the majority who would turn to go onto the side track. Why would you do it? What would be you reason?
    Who’s willing to volunteer a reason? Go ahead, stand up.
    Because it can’t be right to kill five people when you can only kill one person instead.
    It wouldn’t be right to kill five if you could kill one person instead. That’s a good reason. That’s a good reason.
    Who else? Does everybody agree with that reason?

    为了和你们一起玩耍,我容易么我。。。还不点赞!!!
    宝宝们,下期见。


    系列节目链接:

    1970-01-01   54赞       6踩       1382浏览 评论(26)
THG·自嘲的猫
女 戏骨lv63

59446/60928

粉丝 3025关注 124